Defining Leadership Is Vital

April 26, 2019

Defining Leadership Is Vital

unsplash-logoMarkus Spiske

 

 

Ask any five management experts what makes a good leader, and chances are you will get six answers: Aspiration. Inspiration. Imagination. Creativity. Authenticity. Integrity. It’s time for a reality check. While there’s no one-word answer to the leadership question, Mckinsey has identified the stepping stones that enable organisations to develop more effective leadership across the organisation.

To pinpoint them, they looked at the major schools of leadership, including traits-based behavioural, situational, functional and psychological perspectives. Each adds richness to defining leadership, yet with the key limitation that each views leadership through a single lens. Since no single model carries the whole field, an integrated definition and approach are required.

Their fresh definition of organisational leadership strives to be comprehensive and pragmatic: Leadership is a set of behaviours that, in a given context, align an organisation, foster execution and ensure organisational renewal. They are enabled by relevant skills and mindsets.

Here’s how they arrived at that definition and the implications it triggers:

  1. Leadership comes alive in the behaviours that are used, felt and observed across an organisation. They comprise McKinsey's unit of analysis and are what they measure objectively and seek to enhance during leadership development interventions.
  2. The behaviours are highly contextual depending on each organisation. So, it is essential to define leadership traits that prove most effective in helping an organisation achieve its performance goals. Take the chief executive of a U.S. energy utility. When the market was deregulated, the company was plunged into the most serious financial crisis of its history. The CEO helped transform the organisation into a competitive player in a liberalised global market and is convinced that leadership should be a function of economic reality: “You have to put things in the context of a business model. Who are your real customers? What kind of partner do you need to make it work? What do you really do? And where should that work be done?”
  3. Leaders must be able to create organisational alignment, execution and renewal. Without them, performance suffers long term. Any leadership model must seek to achieve these three factors.
  4. A leader’s ability to demonstrate effective leadership reflects relevant skills realised through real-life experience. For example, leadership prowess around “championing the desired change” could signify strong storytelling, written and oral communication, influencing skills, and the ability to anticipate and seize pivotal moments. Leadership development intervention must help leaders forge relevant on-the-job skills and behaviours. As management authority Henry Mintzberg maintains, “Leadership, like swimming, cannot be learned by reading about it.”
  5. Leaders must develop the right mindsets based on introspection and self-awareness. Often, underlying mindsets – including needs, fears and core beliefs – are what drive a leader’s behaviour in a situation. Only about one-third of the 2,500-plus executives in a McKinsey sample said that their organisations’ transformations explicitly assessed the mindsets that required a change to reach their goals. But those that did were four times more likely to succeed. Take, for example, a professional services business that wanted senior leaders to initiate more provocative and meaningful discussions with the firm’s senior clients. Once the trainers looked below the surface, they discovered that these leaders, though highly successful in their fields, were instinctively uncomfortable and lacking in confidence when conversations moved beyond their functional expertise. Only when the leaders realised this and went deeper to understand why were they able to commit themselves to concrete steps that helped push them to change.

Why does a definition of leadership matter? An incomplete definition will produce piecemeal leadership development programs with a misguided focus and poor impact. While organisations get plenty of leadership advice, they lack a way to cut through the noise. McKinsey's definition offers a starting point.

For a more detailed view of the different schools of leadership, or to read about McKinsey's leadership development approach in practice, read their recently released book, Leadership at Scale.

 

This article was originally written by Michiel Kruyt who is a Partner at McKinsey & Co, Gautam Kumra who is Managing Director of McKinsey India, and Ramesh Srinivasan who is a Senior Partner in the McKinsey & Co New York office, and full credit goes to the McKinsey, who published this article earlier this year. This article has been reprinted for the purpose of education.

If you enjoyed this article then why not sign up to our mailing list to gain access to high-quality content and exclusive offers.

 





Also in Portal's Daily Dose

7 Strategies for Promoting Collaboration in a Crisis
7 Strategies for Promoting Collaboration in a Crisis

July 10, 2020

Crises like the Covid-19 pandemic highlight the importance of effective collaboration for long-term commercial success. Particularly in a crisis, organizations need to pull together experts with unique, cross-functional perspectives to solve rapidly changing, complex problems that have long-term implications. 

Continue Reading

A Plan for Managing (Constant) Interruptions at Work
A Plan for Managing (Constant) Interruptions at Work

July 03, 2020

Interruptions have always been a reality of work, as meetings, text or chat messages, emails, and conversations with coworkers endlessly fragment our time and thus our attention. As the Covid-19 global pandemic forced many of us to work from home, the concurrent management of work/non-work responsibilities have added to this already fragmented time.

Continue Reading

Activate agility: the five avenues to success
Activate agility: the five avenues to success

June 26, 2020

In 1935, the life expectancy of an S&P 500 company was 90 years. By 2010, it was 14 years and studies show that it’s getting even shorter. No wonder more and more companies, who are tired of change fatigue and endless restructuring, are looking at how they can become a more agile organization and retain their competitive advantage.

Continue Reading